| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Prevent restored WAL files from being archived again Re: Unnecessary WAL archiving after failover |
| Date: | 2012-08-11 07:33:17 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJoPRPdgz52NCH2m1tOR3MsQPVHtV=cZJGOP=WLCYFh-g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10 August 2012 18:19, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've committed the simplified version for 9.2, as well as adding
>> support for streaming which you seem to have missed out.
>
> If the streaming case really must be covered, the fix should be backported to
> 9.1 and 9.0? Because there is the same "problem" in those versions.
True
> But I'm not sure if this fix is right thing to do. I didn't add any code to the
> streaming case because the current behavior exists since 9.0 and AFAIR
> we've not received the complaints about the behavior. So ISTM changing
> that behavior is debatable and looks like 9.3 item rather than 9.2.
If its a bug with archiving, then why is it not a bug with streaming?
What if you are using archiving and streaming, what then? There isn't
any way of telling the difference between them.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2012-08-11 09:59:02 | Re: Issue in Behavior of Interval Datatype |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-08-11 02:04:26 | Re: macports and brew postgresql --universal builds |