From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple |
Date: | 2012-02-05 20:42:47 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJYaH3Os6FrQPsYYt3BLBTW_4ExXJ+6Ov9RBpRcu6FWrw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> The cause here is data changing underneath the user. Your patch solves
>> the most obvious error, but it still allows other problems if applying
>> the backup block changes data. If the backup block doesn't do anything
>> at all then we don't need to apply it either.
>
> This is nonsense. What applying the backup block does is to apply the
> change that the WAL record would otherwise have applied, except we
> decided to make it store a full-page image instead.
Yep, you're right, my bad.
Got a head cold, so will lay off a few days from too much thinking.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jt_common | 2012-02-06 08:57:56 | BUG #6432: does not begin the installer |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-02-05 04:39:25 | Re: converting between infinity timestamp and float8 (epoch) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-02-05 20:55:20 | Re: Report: race conditions in WAL replay routines |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-02-05 20:40:09 | Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 |