Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums)

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums)
Date: 2013-04-30 14:57:10
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJStyjqp9xSKSgRL_c9t+mYb8H9WsJ1TmBAgFK8Ao-eaw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30 April 2013 15:51, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> ISTM that we also need this patch to put memory barriers in place
>> otherwise the code might be rearranged.
>
> This is simply silly.

You crack me up sometimes. Yes, it is; seem to be having a bad day for thinkos.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2013-04-30 15:03:25 Re: Back branches vs. gcc 4.8.0
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-04-30 14:51:23 Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums)