Re: Checksums, state of play

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Checksums, state of play
Date: 2012-03-06 16:06:49
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJP7kkpxByEP2FvT53NhDgbJVC2pzRWkg3DA0htj6peYw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> I'll keep an open mind for now about database/table level. I'm not
> sure how possible/desirable each is.

Table level sounds great, but how will it work with recovery? We don't
have a relcache in Startup process.

So either database or tablespace level seems doable.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-03-06 16:09:28 Re: Checksums, state of play
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-03-06 15:47:46 Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database