Re: [BUGS] PITR potentially broken in 9.2

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Date: 2012-12-05 09:50:12
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJN_TCkeQfgGmuHzOejVyjYtEtgbf1Y5yz9Aog2xh+06Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 5 December 2012 00:35, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> So apparently this is something we broke since Nov 18. Don't know what
>> yet --- any thoughts?
>
> Further experimentation shows that reverting commit
> ffc3172e4e3caee0327a7e4126b5e7a3c8a1c8cf makes it work. So there's
> something wrong/incomplete about that fix.
>
> This is a bit urgent since we now have to consider whether to withdraw
> 9.2.2 and issue a hasty 9.2.3. Do we have a regression here since
> 9.2.1, and if so how bad is it?

I'll look at this now.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2012-12-05 10:06:55 Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Previous Message JEHAD GHAREEB 2012-12-05 06:49:34 Installing PG 7.3.4 on Linux 6

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2012-12-05 10:06:55 Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Previous Message John R Pierce 2012-12-05 09:46:11 Re: ALTER TABLE ... NOREWRITE option