Re: Last gasp

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Last gasp
Date: 2012-04-05 18:17:14
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJLg6aDi-0LOZXx6HMnEKE6-GY7pbCbjTXkQvfSwEb+qw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> These patches aren't marked with a committer
>>
>> FK arrays
>> ECPG fetch
>> foreign stats
>> command triggers
>> check function
>> parallel pg_dump
>>
>> Does that mean myself or others should be claiming them for commit/reject?
>
> I've been right in the middle of the command triggers stuff, so I
> suppose I would pick that up for commit if it were ready, but there
> hasn't been a new version this week unless I've missed it, and even if
> the new version arrived right this minute, I don't think I or anyone
> else can do a good job committing a patch of that size in the time
> remaining.  So I think it's time to formally put that one out of its
> misery.

I think doing so will cause substantial misery for many users. I find
it hard to believe that such a simple concept hasn't managed to
produce some workable subset after months of work.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-04-05 18:20:00 Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-04-05 18:10:34 Re: Last gasp