From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
Date: | 2012-04-05 18:17:14 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJLg6aDi-0LOZXx6HMnEKE6-GY7pbCbjTXkQvfSwEb+qw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> These patches aren't marked with a committer
>>
>> FK arrays
>> ECPG fetch
>> foreign stats
>> command triggers
>> check function
>> parallel pg_dump
>>
>> Does that mean myself or others should be claiming them for commit/reject?
>
> I've been right in the middle of the command triggers stuff, so I
> suppose I would pick that up for commit if it were ready, but there
> hasn't been a new version this week unless I've missed it, and even if
> the new version arrived right this minute, I don't think I or anyone
> else can do a good job committing a patch of that size in the time
> remaining. So I think it's time to formally put that one out of its
> misery.
I think doing so will cause substantial misery for many users. I find
it hard to believe that such a simple concept hasn't managed to
produce some workable subset after months of work.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-05 18:20:00 | Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-04-05 18:10:34 | Re: Last gasp |