Re: ALTER TABLE ... NOREWRITE option

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE ... NOREWRITE option
Date: 2012-12-05 20:37:52
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJ3uD_kK=zAM=TysggOQ2L=31__HKsFUqvAoyO4-uj=rg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5 December 2012 19:15, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> That's why we need a mechanism which either logs, or aborts on specific
>> actions. From the perspective of the DevOps staff, abort is possibly
>> the better option, but there may be issues with it on our end. That was
>> the attraction of the original NOREWRITE patch, although as I said that
>> suffers from new keywords and a total lack of extensibility.
>
> You know, event triggers seem like an awfully good solution to this
> problem. All we'd need is a new event called table_rewrite:
>
> CREATE EVENT TRIGGER my_event_trigger
> ON table_rewrite
> EXECUTE PROCEDURE consider_whether_to_throw_an_error();

+1, I was just thinking that myself.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2012-12-05 20:41:36 Re: Dumping an Extension's Script
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-12-05 20:36:31 Re: Dumping an Extension's Script