Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Date: 2014-12-13 20:45:22
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJ-F=pK6Cs9=LkV3u9ap-f6ej8Fq7Euh2XU7s+2wHxTjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13 December 2014 at 14:36, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Something to be aware of btw is that this patch introduces an
> additional 8 bytes per block image in WAL as it contains additional
> information to control the compression. In this case this is the
> uint16 compress_len present in XLogRecordBlockImageHeader.

So we add 8 bytes to all FPWs, or only for compressed FPWs?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2014-12-13 20:45:54 PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL
Previous Message Álvaro Hernández Tortosa 2014-12-13 19:07:36 Re: Commitfest problems