Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.

On 14 September 2012 17:28, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
>> Does this mean we need to wrap new tarballs soon, because of the data loss
>> bug?
>
> I'll defer to Robert on whether this bug is serious enough to merit a
> near-term release on its own. But historically, we've wanted to push
> out a .1 update two or three weeks after a .0 release, to mop up
> whatever new bugs are nasty enough for people to trip over right away.
> Maybe we should be thinking in terms of a set of releases around the
> end of September.

The bug itself is not major, but the extent and user impact is serious.

In my opinion we should issue a new release of 9.1 immediately.

9.2 might have different treatment but does suffer the same problem.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services