Re: pgsql: REINDEX SCHEMA

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: REINDEX SCHEMA
Date: 2014-12-09 08:12:41
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+sCnHvgCcqxYTQoVye+_x6tF89wgR+Y5sU-hLTUKPehA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On 9 December 2014 at 15:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> REINDEX SCHEMA
>
> The results from jagarundi and leech suggest that more attention needs to
> be paid to ensuring that tables are reindexed in a consistent order.
> Either that, or you're going to have to dumb down the regression test.

OK, thanks, looking again now.

Do you get emails when something fails?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2014-12-09 09:11:23 pgsql: Silence REINDEX
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-12-09 08:00:29 Re: pgsql: REINDEX SCHEMA