| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG-Strom - A GPU optimized asynchronous executor module |
| Date: | 2012-01-23 14:56:26 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+r=Z2S547q-s3TQ4ELfGjfbkE+9THNxyHXFHG+9HqRbw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Also, the query you mention is probably the best performing query you
>> can come up with. It looks like a GIS query, yet isn't. Would it be
>> possible to run tests on the TPC-H suite and do a full comparison of
>> strengths/weaknesses so we can understand the breadth of applicability
>> of the techniques.
>>
> DBT-2 is a good alternative, even though TPC-H is expensive to run.
DBT-2 is an OLTP test, not a DSS/DW test.
I'm not interested in the full TPC-H test, just a query by query
comparison of how well this stacks up. If there are other tests that
are also balanced/representative, I'd like to see those also. Just so
we can see the benefit envelope.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2012-01-23 14:59:53 | GUC_REPORT for protocol tunables was: Re: Optimize binary serialization format of arrays with fixed size elements |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-01-23 14:52:19 | Re: patch: ALTER TABLE IF EXISTS |