From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | ALTER TABLE set reloptions |
Date: | 2014-04-09 09:41:46 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+Cc89M8XPzwmAeaD=86ivW3fTtqGnmjjShz=HC3qqM-g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
As part of the ALTER TABLE lock reductions we've now agreed that
reloptions should have a lock level associated with them, so we can
take appropriate lock levels.
Attached patch will be applied at start of 9.5 dev cycle, so that any
new relopt authors are aware that lock levels are needed for any new
work.
Later patch will then use this infrastructure to (attempt) to reduce
lock levels, assuming no problems.
Added to next CF for June 2014, not for commit yet.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
relopt.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-04-09 09:44:04 | Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-04-09 09:34:42 | Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins |