ALTER TABLE set reloptions

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: ALTER TABLE set reloptions
Date: 2014-04-09 09:41:46
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+Cc89M8XPzwmAeaD=86ivW3fTtqGnmjjShz=HC3qqM-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

As part of the ALTER TABLE lock reductions we've now agreed that
reloptions should have a lock level associated with them, so we can
take appropriate lock levels.

Attached patch will be applied at start of 9.5 dev cycle, so that any
new relopt authors are aware that lock levels are needed for any new
work.

Later patch will then use this infrastructure to (attempt) to reduce
lock levels, assuming no problems.

Added to next CF for June 2014, not for commit yet.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
relopt.patch application/octet-stream 7.4 KB

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-04-09 09:44:04 Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2014-04-09 09:34:42 Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins