From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Commits 8de72b and 5457a1 (COPY FREEZE) |
Date: | 2012-12-06 14:20:43 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+Bc-ODojsLfD=3UwQ_miarhjChMoG-SMLESXzt+JrnBA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6 December 2012 14:12, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I remain unconvinced by that argument, but if I am alone with this
> ok. Could we at least make it a WARNING? Nobody ever reads NOTICEs
> because it contains so much noise. And this is isn't noise. Its a bug
> on the client side.
It's not a bug. Requesting a useful, but not critical optimisation is
just a hint. The preconditions are not easy to understand, so I see no
reason to punish people that misunderstand, or cause programs to fail
in ways that need detailed understanding to make them work again.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | MauMau | 2012-12-06 14:41:39 | Serious problem: media recovery fails after system or PostgreSQL crash |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-12-06 14:12:21 | Re: Commits 8de72b and 5457a1 (COPY FREEZE) |