| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, david(at)fetter(dot)org, aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca, stark(at)mit(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 |
| Date: | 2012-02-29 15:42:17 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+BE3ewsgrHm87R2UO=PPHHd2MxMUPecJVXsq37EbVd5w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Surely it can be done online. You'll just need a third state between off and
> on, where checksums are written but not verified, while the cluster is
> scanned.
Are you saying you would accept the patch if we had this?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-02-29 15:46:01 | Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-29 15:33:04 | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |