Re: Last gasp

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Last gasp
Date: 2012-04-05 18:45:06
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+60AKef=LU-G1158hC5vdw5rh3_tRHK1CBXjSo6ke27Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> The FK locking patch isn't on this list;

We'd agreed you were the assigned committer, hence not on list.

> however, I'm hijacking this
> thread to say that some benchmarking runs we tried weren't all that
> great, showing 9% performance degradation on stock pgbench -- i.e.  a
> large hit that will harm everybody even if they are not using FKs at
> all.  I'm thus setting the patch returned with feedback, which is sure
> to make several hackers happy and tons of users unhappy.

I've done what I can to alter that, but I think its the right decision
at this point. I would say its been the largest and most subtle patch
submitted, so please don't be down by that.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2012-04-05 18:46:39 Re: Last gasp
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-04-05 18:40:17 Re: Last gasp