Re: Sending notifications from the master to the standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sending notifications from the master to the standby
Date: 2012-01-12 15:18:46
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+1TP9MhuzGJ-nTCQWmDdrcSZBG6pA7b97EMwR1NcZymA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>> The obvious first use case for this is for cache invalidation.
>
> Yeah, upthread Simon pointed out that propagating notifies would be
> useful for flushing caches in applications that watch the database in a
> read-only fashion.  I grant that such a use-case is technically possible
> within the limitations of a slave server; I'm just dubious that it's a
> sufficiently attractive use-case to justify the complexity and future
> maintenance costs of the sort of designs we are talking about.  Or in
> other words: so far, cache invalidation is not the "first" use-case,
> it's the ONLY POSSIBLE use-case.  That's not useful enough.

Many people clearly do think this is useful.

I personally don't think it will be that complex. I'm willing to
review and maintain it if the patch works the way we want it to.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-01-12 15:23:23 Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-01-12 15:13:55 Re: log messages for archive recovery progress