From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Broken SSL tests in master |
Date: | 2016-12-01 20:46:04 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobzNTkgKgLz=mqbQNo5PDxwwiie3pj6XFVzVLXTV95NLQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> check-world isn't a magic bullet.
>
>> No, but deliberately leaving things out that could be run isn't
>> helping anything either.
>
> Tests that open security holes while running aren't in my list of "things
> that could be run automatically".
If we create a new target that runs them automatically, you don't have
to use it.
> In any case, you're in a poor position to whine about this given that
> parallel query is entirely unamenable to automated testing, and you've
> resisted past proposals for improving that situation.
Really?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-01 20:46:15 | Re: Parallel safety of CURRENT_* family |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-01 20:40:27 | Re: Broken SSL tests in master |