Re: Failure to coerce unknown type to specific type

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Postgres-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Failure to coerce unknown type to specific type
Date: 2015-04-30 13:05:41
Message-ID: CA+TgmobymzvoNZLwk-m_b3XTL8JQowyjLJyM8JkCyjhj5CrcvA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> We should, in fact, fail that to begin with. Unknown-type columns are
>>> a spectactularly horrid idea.
>
>> I agree. So why don't we throw an error when someone tries to create one?
>
> We should IMO, but there's been push-back about backwards compatibility
> when this has been proposed in the past.

I do think that there are probably people who have got cruft lying
around in their database where they've accidentally created views or
tables with unknown-type columns. They are unlikely to be actually
used, but they may exist. If we want to ease the
backward-compatibility pain, maybe we could map unknown -> text, so
that the upgrade still works but changes the column type under the
hood. Or we can just break it. But we should do something.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-04-30 13:08:39 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #11805: Missing SetServiceStatus call during service shutdown in pg_ctl (Windows only)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-04-30 13:02:36 Re: Re: BUG #12990: Missing pg_multixact/members files (appears to have wrapped, then truncated)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-04-30 13:08:39 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #11805: Missing SetServiceStatus call during service shutdown in pg_ctl (Windows only)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-04-30 13:02:55 Re: Use outerPlanState() consistently in executor code