Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Kincaid <tomjohnkincaid(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)
Date: 2021-08-24 17:26:05
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoby=nUSNrMaJEOqShP878=C5tHQ453B4vgndGwCzeGJWA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:43 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Yes, it is a trade-off. If we had pg_upgrade create the new cluster,
> the pg_upgrade instructions would be simpler, but pg_upgrade would be
> more complex since it has to adjust _everything_ properly so pg_upgrade
> works --- I never got to that point, but I am willing to explore what
> would be required.

It's probably a topic for another thread, rather than this one, but I
think that would be very cool.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-08-24 17:26:20 Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2021-08-24 17:25:25 Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)