Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Subject: Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Date: 2015-04-02 19:21:55
Message-ID: CA+TgmobvN76TmvhK97KC3OU8fbVW-BhTB+g_hgGXDVEdavrzLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think this is really nice work, so I have committed this version. I
> made a few fairly minor changes, hopefully without breaking anything
> in the process:
>
> - I adjusted things for recent commits around INT{32,63}_{MIN_MAX}.
> - I removed (void) ssup; which I do not think is normal PostgreSQL style.
> - Removed the #if DEC_DIGITS != 4 check. The comment is great, but I
> think we don't need protect against #if 0 code get re-enabled.
> - I removed the too-clever (at least IMHO) handing of TRACE_SORT in
> favor of just using #ifdef around each occurrence.
> - I also declared trace_sort in guc.h, where various other GUCs are
> declared, instead of declaring it privately in each file that needed
> it.
> - Changed some definitions to depend on SIZEOF_DATUM rather than
> USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL. Hopefully I didn't muff this; please check it.
> - Fixed an OID conflict.
> - And of course, bumped catversion.

And that's broken the buildfarm. Argh.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-04-02 19:59:53 Re: Something is rotten in the state of Denmark...
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-04-02 19:18:10 Re: Something is rotten in the state of Denmark...