Re: nested hstore patch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: nested hstore patch
Date: 2013-11-19 16:00:09
Message-ID: CA+TgmobvAP2iB37VPVtwppgbh8x-v7hP7Wn+YGrqw4AjVz5ySw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:51:06AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think this was the consensus solution when this was last discussed,
>> and I support it. There is similar space for a binary XML data type
>> if someone feels like implementing it. I think the names that were
>> proposed previously were something like jsonb and xmlb.
>
> The natural name is OBJSON, meaning object JSON, because as PostgreSQL
> people, we have to double-use letters wherever possible. ;-)

Personally, I think the patch author should just run ps auxww | md5 |
sed 's/^[^0-9]//' | cut -c1-8 and call the new data type by the
resulting name.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-11-19 16:04:25 Re: nested hstore patch
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-11-19 15:59:31 Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL