| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Slow tab completion w/ lots of tables |
| Date: | 2012-08-21 18:14:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobtY-F3twibBjiOFj07T=ob2fqUZRorfaFmnqmvg9xkMw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> In short, I think we might be able to make this fast, and more usable,
> just with hacking on psql's query generation rules. There's no need for
> server-side changes.
So, I think that hacking on psql's query generation rules may well be
a good idea, but shouldn't we also be bumping procost for the
pg_whatever_is_visible functions? I mean, Stephen's information
suggests that those values are pretty clearly wrong, regardless of
anything else.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-08-21 18:15:52 | Re: 9.2RC1 wraps this Thursday ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-21 18:14:33 | Re: 9.2RC1 wraps this Thursday ... |