Re: Autonomous Transaction is back

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Autonomous Transaction is back
Date: 2015-09-09 14:04:01
Message-ID: CA+TgmobsYq=Pk-WzyoDg9HvOOiYPXivx0JMku_AiDpFG9u-5RA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> What design principle(s) have you been using to decide how autonomous
> transactions should behave?

I have to admit to a complete lack of principle. I'm quite frightened
of what this is going to need from the lock manager, and I'm trying to
wriggle out of having to do things there that are going to be nastily
hard. My wriggling isn't going very well, though.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-09-09 14:10:02 Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-09-09 14:00:50 Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql