Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Date: 2017-04-25 15:20:49
Message-ID: CA+TgmobsMHbQdGv==HCcYGVG5gzS+GiaDjsBVMMQ4Ys1OpyYhg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I wouldn't fret over the slight slowdown vs the old patch, it could be
> noise (the script only completed a single run at scale 400).

Yeah, seems fine.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2017-04-25 15:24:01 Re: PG 10 release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2017-04-25 15:20:46 Re: PG 10 release notes