Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample
Date: 2022-02-11 18:13:46
Message-ID: CA+TgmobqyX6s2VQ0=HGZc4xW+tOusPa0FLfSevH_PA2Kum34BA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 1:06 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> While I'm not opposed to moving those goalposts at some point,
> I think pushing them all the way up to 9.5 for this one easily-fixed
> problem is not very reasonable.
>
> Given other recent discussion, an argument could be made for moving
> the cutoff to 9.2, on the grounds that it's too hard to test against
> anything older. But that still leaves us needing a version check
> if we want to use TABLESAMPLE.

OK, thanks.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-02-11 18:18:58 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-02-11 18:06:01 Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample