From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jason Petersen <jason(at)citusdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression |
Date: | 2017-06-01 14:51:10 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobnrAayDt9JZMM3EL+zWZQ8_=LOnTBjL0vRzLHq2NSZpA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Here's a patch doing what I suggested above. The second patch addresses
> an independent oversight where the post alter hook was invoked before
> doing the catalog update.
0002 is a slam-dunk. I don't object to 0001 but haven't reviewed it carefully.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-01 16:22:53 | Re: BUG #14676: neqsel is NULL dumb |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-01 13:45:24 | Re: BUG #14681: Erroneous modulo (%) result |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-06-01 14:54:30 | Re: <> join selectivity estimate question |
Previous Message | Shubham Barai | 2017-06-01 14:31:12 | Re: GSoC 2017 : Proposal for predicate locking in gist index |