Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
Date: 2018-01-04 21:34:18
Message-ID: CA+TgmobmRV+vvYEHAiTV_6=RyWXx+hSVX_+vEkmQ6uvmPrM7qA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:29 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting() now returns PartitionTupleRouting *.
>
> Did this change in v3 version of
> 0001-Encapsulate-partition-related-info-in-a-structure.patch

I'll have to come back to some of the other open issues, but 0001 and
0005 look good to me now, so I pushed those as a single commit after
fixing a few things that pgindent didn't like. I also think 0002 and
0003 look basically good, so I pushed those two as a single commit
also. But the comment changes in 0003 didn't seem extensive enough to
me so I made a few more changes there along the way.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-01-04 21:36:57 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-01-04 21:26:58 Re: Finalizing logical replication limitations as well as potential features