Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump
Date: 2016-05-06 19:22:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmobmOkhu-Fme9bvf=aFAA8XoGVcwh4rPK4U=osqNXsvF-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2016-05-06 15:11:53 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Peter Eisentraut (peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
>> > On 5/6/16 2:06 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> > >Add TAP tests for pg_dump
>> >
>> > I'd be the first to welcome this, but what happened to feature freeze?
>>
>> These are just new tests..? I assumed that would be welcome during post
>> feature-freeze, and certainly no one raised any concerns about adding
>> these tests during the discussion prior to my commiting them.
>>
>> We back-patch new tests from time to time too, when they're associated
>> with bug fixes, so I'm pretty confused why TAP tests would be an issue
>> to add on HEAD post feature-freeze.
>>
>> If the consensus is that we shouldn't add new tests during feature
>> freeze, I'll revert the patch that added them and add them later, but,
>> for my 2c at least, I think we should be happy to add these even after
>> feature freeze.
>
> +1

I think it's appropriate at least in this case. It seems to be
related to Stephen wanting to make sure he found all of the bugs he
introduced in pre-freeze commits, which I think can be included under
an expansive definition of a mop-up commit. I think there's some
limit to what we ought to add to the 9.6 testing infrastructure at
this late date, but I'm not inclined to fight about this one.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-05-06 19:27:04 pgsql: Remove MODULES_big from test_pg_dump
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2016-05-06 19:18:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold <

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-05-06 19:31:56 Re: SET ROLE and reserved roles
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-05-06 19:18:23 Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE