Re: PostgreSQL 17 Release Management Team & Feature Freeze

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 17 Release Management Team & Feature Freeze
Date: 2024-04-08 19:49:51
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobkt=Afu0ZcWQ+OktZxKzyMEON1wf4514vdniv5g9fSVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 3:32 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> Maybe a better solution to this problem would be to spread impactful
> reviews by committers more evenly throughout the year. Then there
> wouldn't be such a rush to address them in the last commit fest.

Spreading activity of all sorts more evenly through the year should
definitely be the goal, I think. It's just not exactly clear how we
can do that.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Verite 2024-04-08 20:03:21 Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-04-08 19:47:34 post-freeze damage control