Re: Superuser connect during smart shutdown

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Superuser connect during smart shutdown
Date: 2014-10-20 18:19:43
Message-ID: CA+TgmobkUg8BFeHY8NZS=Ja17tUh1gz9dB-CGzukboOBkN=DFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> But TBH I suspect 95% of the problems here would vanish if smart
>>> shutdown weren't the default ...
>
>> But for your repeated objections, we would have changed the default to fast years ago. AFAICT everyone else is in favor of that.
>
> I've certainly objected to it in the past, but I don't believe
> I was the only one objecting.

What's your feeling now?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-10-20 18:59:31 pg_basebackup fails with long tablespace paths
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-10-20 16:16:52 Re: Trailing comma support in SELECT statements