| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Marc-Olaf Jaschke <marc-olaf(dot)jaschke(at)s24(dot)com>, Postgres-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
| Date: | 2016-03-23 00:57:05 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobk2enJT3tk_-MyuSk3xc-0Ji7TESwe-Pet_3ATpVOwxQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Here are the results on Fedora 16 and RHEL 7.1.
>
> So much for the theory that it's fixed in RHEL7. I now think that the
> glibc folk actually do not know about this, and have accordingly filed
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320356
Good plan, but what do we do between now and when they fix it? This
seems quite bad.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-23 01:02:15 | Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-23 00:51:38 | Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-23 00:58:03 | Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2016-03-23 00:56:23 | Re: about google summer of code 2016 |