Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Date: 2015-11-03 03:16:02
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobj_CMjh4Eu+LWHeh4_FNa=J6pPW8rtyCyzgCfVcH38Wg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> fixed patch attached

The documentation included in this patch doesn't really make it clear
why -g is different from or better than -c.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-11-03 03:17:29 Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2015-11-03 03:13:44 Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink