| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Make wal_receiver_timeout configurable per subscription |
| Date: | 2025-05-19 15:19:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobgPuxLWMbTzBE72yKDQJTXpCnGjtCN3v5N=u_F3uD_nw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 2:48 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The GUC wal_receiver_interval is also used for physical replication
> and logical launcher, so won't making it userset can impact those
> cases as well, but maybe that is okay. However, for the specific case
> you are worried about, isn't it better to make it a subscription
> option as that won't have a chance to impact any other cases?
The advantage of Fujii-san's proposal is that it is very simple to
implement. A subscription option would indeed be better, but it would
also be considerably more complex. Why not start simple and if someone
wants to do the work to add something more complicated, that is fine?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florents Tselai | 2025-05-19 15:29:15 | Re: Proposal: Make cfbot fail on patches not created by "git format-patch" |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-05-19 15:10:19 | Re: Proposal: Make cfbot fail on patches not created by "git format-patch" |