| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: UPDATE of partition key |
| Date: | 2017-10-12 21:18:25 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobgDp+dVxE4h+rVG40fweCwz5vUx460o4oRd4KbAebjyA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Preparatory patches :
> 0001-Prepare-for-re-using-UPDATE-result-rels-during-tuple.patch
> 0002-Prevent-a-redundant-ConvertRowtypeExpr-node.patch
> Main patch :
> update-partition-key_v20.patch
Committed 0001 with a few tweaks and 0002 unchanged. Please check
whether everything looks OK.
Is anybody still reviewing the main patch here? (It would be good if
the answer is "yes".)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-10-12 21:23:34 | Re: Pluggable storage |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-10-12 21:01:48 | Re: oversight in EphemeralNamedRelation support |