Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding
Date: 2015-09-03 16:10:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmobeMhBjvxbrc9uCO9ud4yPYh0_rHXwad+2rs8U-x6uBwg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Yes, I assumed that. Logical replication uses WAL, so if you are
> synchronous with WAL, logical replication is synchronous too. However,
> of course, it is synchronous in being durable, not synchronous in terms
> of applying the WAL. This is true of binary and logical replication.

But, Thomas Munro is fixing it!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-09-03 16:14:21 Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-09-03 16:06:18 Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff