Re: Packages: Again

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packages: Again
Date: 2017-01-11 20:58:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmobdtEGutVaHZGq3Es8Fa6UeRyL4CKsrwjt7d9SjdTWC3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> We have a schemas instead - the PostgreSQL schema is close to Oracle
>> packages.
>
> No. It isn't.

I'm gonna say "yeah, it is".

And that's all I will say about this topic.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-01-11 21:05:11 Re: plan_rows confusion with parallel queries
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-01-11 20:57:25 Re: merging some features from plpgsql2 project