Re: unused_oids script is broken with bsd sed

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unused_oids script is broken with bsd sed
Date: 2018-05-03 17:33:29
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobds-8ed3L6f4=Er0TBmCAM4f5c0qxEuQRtQhUWxh9AVA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Personally, I use ccache which doesn't seem to care too much, but I agree
> than in some usages, extra touches of headers would be costly. Perhaps
> it's worth adding logic to avoid overwriting an existing output file
> unless it changed? I'm not sure; that would cost something too.

It seems like a good idea to me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-05-03 17:42:54 Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-05-03 17:16:29 Re: Python 3.7 support