Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> On 04/07/2017 11:37 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
>>>> I found some missing bits in the 0002 patch -- new version attached.
>>>> Will wait on new regression tests before committing, but I expect we'll
>>>> have those by end of today and be able to commit the rest tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Attached are the regression test updates for partitioned tables.
>>
>> Actually attached this time.
>
> Based on my review and testing of the 0002 patch I believe it is
> correct. However Mike and I just went through the regression test patch
> line by line and there are issues he needs to address -- there is no way
> that is happening by tonight as the output is very verbose and we need
> to be sure we are both testing the correct things and getting the
> correct behaviors.
>
> Based on that I can:
>
> 1) commit the 0002 patch now before the feature freeze and follow up
> with the regression test patch when ready in a couple of days
> 2) hold off on both patches until ready
> 3) push both patches to the next commitfest/pg11
>
> Some argue this is an open issue against the new partitioning feature in
> pg10 and therefore should be addressed now, and others do not. I can see
> both sides of that argument.
>
> In any case, thoughts on what to do?

Speaking only for myself, I'm OK with any of those options, provided
that that "a couple" means what my dictionary says it means.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company