Re: Portability issues in TAP tests

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Thomas Fanghaenel <tfanghaenel(at)salesforce(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Portability issues in TAP tests
Date: 2014-07-22 17:25:50
Message-ID: CA+TgmobbzLLYV1ikkJnH6U=ELC7wA-xYFqsuA=1MUsVTzSECpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 07/21/2014 02:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I had the same feeling about the Perl on RHEL6 ;-). The TAP tests
>>> will need to be a great deal more portable than they've proven so far
>>> before they'll really be useful for anything much. I trust we're
>>> committed to making that happen.
>
>> I'd be rather inclined to remove them from the check-world and
>> installcheck-world targets until we have dealt with the issues people
>> have identified.
>
> I think it would be reasonable to do that in the 9.4 branch, since
> it's a bit hard to argue that the TAP tests are production grade
> at the moment. We could leave them there in HEAD.

That doesn't do developers who can't run the tests in their
environment much good: most people develop against master. Maybe
that's the point: to get these fixed. But it's pretty annoying that
I can no longer do 'make world'.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-07-22 17:26:35 Re: Behavior of "OFFSET -1"
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-07-22 17:22:07 Re: parametric block size?