| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: PassDownLimitBound for ForeignScan/CustomScan [take-2] |
| Date: | 2017-01-04 20:29:02 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobbyVXTm+UvhJmrVmnJ1PUXTmbnxADDfVC=vkfmNi_=Cw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> Oops, I oversight this patch was marked as "returned with feedback",
> not "moved to the next CF".
>
> Its status has not been changed since the last update. (Code was
> revised according to the last
> comment by Jeevan, but CF-Nov was time up at that time.)
>
> How do I handle the patch?
Can you just change the status to "Moved to Next CF" and then make it
"Needs Review"?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-04 20:30:47 | Re: ALTER SYSTEM for pg_hba.conf |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-01-04 20:23:10 | Re: Replication/backup defaults |