Re: role self-revocation

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: role self-revocation
Date: 2022-03-09 13:02:25
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobbnro+Z-uFZCGr_y6wq8gANo8EaYSvcZK2kekDdtFaZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 7:55 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Do we have subtractive permissions today?

Not in the GRANT/REVOKE sense, I think, but you can put a user in a
group and then mention that group in pg_hba.conf. And that line might
be "reject" or whatever.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-03-09 13:14:10 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2022-03-09 13:01:41 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby