Re: Status of the table access method work

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Status of the table access method work
Date: 2019-06-11 18:20:06
Message-ID: CA+TgmobbiCEGR3+LvSNOKi+h4=VpstKB7eODydqJEuMt9wCjiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:32 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Yea, I think there's plenty reasons to want to do something different
> than what we're doing. But I'd like to see a concrete proposal before
> building API for it...

I wasn't intending to propose that you should. We're just in the
brainstorming stage here I think.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2019-06-11 18:35:23 Re: Avoiding hash join batch explosions with extreme skew and weird stats
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-06-11 17:57:45 Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters