Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning
Date: 2017-03-31 21:37:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmobayEFN4ObA5xTTd=Ao23iQ13yhkCa2Zecp72LPMBRYBA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Attached updated patch.

Committed with editing here and there. I just left out the thing
about UNION ALL views, which seemed to brief a treatment to deserve
its own subsection. Maybe a longer explanation of that is worthwhile
or maybe it's not, but that can be a separate patch.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-03-31 21:44:39 Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-03-31 21:33:01 Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT