Re: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c
Date: 2015-11-12 13:16:36
Message-ID: CA+TgmobaWXp0ry-MOChYE13dW-_wC7m7heupMYL+ooZYPtLxGA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
>> > The attached main patch (custom-scan-on-readfuncs.v3.patch) once
>> > removes TextOutCustomScan, thus all the serialized tokens become
>> > known to the core backend, and add _readCustomScan() at readfuncs.c.
>> > It deserializes CustomScan nodes from cstring tokens, especially,
>> > reloads the pointer of CustomScanMethods tables using a pair of
>> > library name and symbol name.
>> > Thus, it also requires custom scan providers to keep the methods
>> > table visible from external objects.
>>
>> Committed with some kibitzing.
>>
> Thanks,
>
> How do we deal with TextOutCustomScan in the v9.5 tree?
> I think we ought to remove this callback also prior to v9.5 release.

I'll do that if there's a clear consensus in favor. I wasn't sure it
really made sense so close to release.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2015-11-12 13:21:01 Re: psql: add \pset true/false
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-11-12 13:15:38 Re: Multixid hindsight design