Re: Draft release notes complete

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete
Date: 2012-05-10 18:29:47
Message-ID: CA+TgmobZBcLwh8cj2ggGzZ+5WAazKtDAGn-2=4iwcCx9g95UTA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Then reviewers should be removed.
>>>
>>> I disagree.  We're trying to get more reviewers, and encourage them to
>>> do more reviewing.  Giving credit is a big part of that.
>>
>> Are you disagreeing with Bruce's premise, my logic, or the conclusion?
>
> Hah, good point.  I'm disagreeing with the conclusion that reviewers
> should be removed, unless we're going to remove everyone *and* give them
> credit elsewhere.  Which I would also be in favor of, I'm just not able
> to do the work right now.

Well, the problem with the way it is right now is that we're giving
similar amounts of credit for very different amounts of contribution,
which IMHO is no good. I think that putting a "Credits" section at
the bottom and listing contributors there would be a reasonable
solution; I also think that crediting people on a web page or in some
other place would be a fine solution. What we have right now manages
to be both unfair and unreadable.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-05-10 18:30:35 Re: Gsoc2012 idea, tablesample
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2012-05-10 18:29:20 Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog