| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Yilin Zhang <jiezhilove(at)126(dot)com>, KENAN YILMAZ <kenan(dot)yilmaz(at)localus(dot)com(dot)tr>, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bypassing cursors in postgres_fdw to enable parallel plans |
| Date: | 2026-08-02 18:08:28 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobZ1z8G_OhCHQn0VuoeZ57WJ6CY8HkvMaZPhfp0crx9zw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 5:51 AM Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Regarding your other point, that's my understanding too that this memset is working because it is the only one in struct.
> Should we also change that to clearing only pendingAreq instead of the complete struct memset that it is doing now? Should this be done as a separate patch?
Yeah, I think that should probably be changed. Not sure whether it
needs a separate patch.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2026-08-02 20:11:50 | Re: GiST multirange index scans can fail to return rows |
| Previous Message | Kirill Reshke | 2026-08-02 18:04:39 | Re: GiST multirange index scans can fail to return rows |