Re: Using defines for protocol characters

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Date: 2023-08-17 16:22:24
Message-ID: CA+TgmobYkUJfwE85dsYU0HStK1QQ-cQvHGQ_r-uKdrG4Mph9WQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 12:13 PM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 09:31:55AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Looks sensible seen from here.
>
> Thanks for taking a look.

I think this is going to be a major improvement in terms of readability!

I'm pretty happy with this version, too. We may be running out of
things to argue about -- and no, I don't want to argue about
underscores more!

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2023-08-17 16:34:36 Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-08-17 16:13:34 Re: Using defines for protocol characters