Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
Date: 2021-03-19 18:07:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmobXnzCRf-UOWnjk+OoCT-mzFR867HvoxM2N9uA7+_V-+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 1:44 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> Working with one of Andrey's patches on another thread, he reported offlist
> getting this message, resolved by this patch. Do you see this warning during
> ./configure ? The latest CI is of a single patch without the LZ4 stuff, so I
> can't check its log.
>
> configure: WARNING: lz4.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!
> configure: WARNING: lz4.h: proceeding with the compiler's result

No, I don't see this. I wonder whether this could possibly be an
installation issue on Andrey's machine? If not, it must be
version-dependent or installation-dependent in some way.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2021-03-19 18:16:22 Re: non-HOT update not looking at FSM for large tuple update
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-03-19 18:03:21 Do we work with LLVM 12 on s390x?