Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity
Date: 2022-12-19 19:56:43
Message-ID: CA+TgmobXUG8_b2+VCwDpo=ZK4MO2BziFmTLx7U-W3m15MrNbrA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 2:29 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Makes sense.
> >
> > +1
>
> +1

Committed with a bit more word-smithing on the documentation.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2022-12-19 19:58:24 Re: Refactor SCRAM code to dynamically handle hash type and key length
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-12-19 19:33:06 Re: Use get_call_result_type() more widely