Re: Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation
Date: 2017-04-12 18:21:10
Message-ID: CA+TgmobWYXPG8PqqqF-X21J3ev8o4K7rFxobGJufU=++cQ1smA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> That is very much appreciated! You writing a second implementation of the
> client-side support (libpq being the first) is very, very helpful, to
> validate that the protocol is sane, unambiguous, and adequately documented.

+1.

> Yes, we need to nail down the protocol and \password before beta. I am
> working on them now.

Good to hear.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-04-12 18:34:46 Re: Undefined psql variables
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-04-12 18:11:54 Re: pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table